Yes, though Hektar's strongest fit is multi-family and mixed-use development. Single-family housing works for projects with multiple units on a shared site, such as row houses, point houses, or small clusters. For a single villa on a single lot, Hektar is overkill. The tool's value scales with the number of decisions to make about typology, layout, and density. The more parcels and typology options on the table, the more useful Hektar becomes.

Yes. Master plans are one of Hektar's strongest use cases. The tool handles large sites with multiple parcels, road networks, and varied typology zones. For municipal master planning, Hektar produces comparison scenarios that show how different density targets, typology mixes, or street networks affect outcomes. This is particularly useful for early dialogue with stakeholders, where comparing three master plan options side by side is more productive than presenting one finished proposal.

Hektar handles projects from single-parcel infill to multi-hectare master plans. The most common use case is housing development on raw or under-utilized land, where typology and density are the main questions. Single-family housing projects work, as do mixed-use schemes where residential is the dominant function. The tool is at its strongest when the brief is to test what a site can carry rather than to refine a known design. If you already have a fixed scheme and need to detail it, Hektar is not the right phase.