A statistics zone is a polygon you draw on the map to report areas, ratios, and unit counts for a part of the site separately from the project total. Use them for neighbourhoods, phases, or ownership boundaries. They only group results, they do not change generation or any other feature.

Hektar's scenarios are designed for early-stage decision support, not for construction documentation. The geometry is accurate enough to inform acquisition, typology selection, and density negotiations. KPIs like BTA, coverage, and daylight hours are calculated from the actual generated geometry, not estimated. The trade-off is that Hektar does not replace detailed structural, MEP, or compliance verification. A scenario that performs well in Hektar still requires later validation. The accuracy is calibrated for the decisions made at this phase: yes or no to acquisition, which typology to develop further, how to negotiate density with the municipality.

Yes, raw land acquisition is one of the highest-value use cases. Before a bid, Hektar tests buildable density against the actual site constraints rather than rules-of-thumb. A site that looks weak under traditional density modeling can look strong when typology and constraint geometry are tested together. A site that looks strong on a coverage ratio basis can look weak when daylight, noise, and slope are layered in. Acquisition decisions made on tested density carry less hidden risk than those made on paper density.